Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.
UC Berkeley clash
cuts against free speech
Re: “Violent rally halts even with speaker from Israel” (Page B1, Feb. 29).
As an alumna of that bastion of higher learning, I was disgusted to hear and read about the demonstration against the speaker from Israel.
As I recall, the free speech movement started in Berkeley, or does that apply only to those whose opinions the students agree with? I will no longer financially support UC Berkeley.
Maryann Sheridan
Walnut Creek
PUC should shine light
on PG&E overspending
Re: “Profits at PG&E spark outrage” (Page A1, Feb. 23).
In this era of continuous utility rate increases, was anyone surprised PG&E earned $2.24 billion in profit last year? While some families are now deciding whether to eat or keep their lights on, PG&E is reaping a Smaug’s horde and projecting further riches in the future.
Even more insulting, PG&E continues profligate spending on massive advertising campaigns, widespread litigation and needless projects such as tree-cutting above gas pipelines. CPUC rate case filings and financial disclosures fail to fully detail the incredible waste within the company.
Public outrage has historically fallen on deaf ears. Elected officials should hold PG&E accountable by daylighting its massive expenditures, and the CPUC should consider rebates to hard-hit customers.
Michael Dawson
Lafayette
Fremont road changes
make driving dangerous
Fremont’s “War on Cars” is continuing with great success.
Street corners have been so narrowed that making a turn into or out of one often risks hitting or being hit by another car. There are intersections that no longer have right turn lanes and traffic backs up. The true genius of this is when the light changes to green so the right turn can safely be made, the pedestrians now cross. This stops the right turns and traffic continues to back up. Drivers who have been waiting to go through continue to wait and often try to escape this trap by suddenly pulling into the left lane almost hitting another car. More gas used and frustrated drivers.
An intelligent design would coordinate the pedestrian crossing by perhaps making all four corners a go with no car traffic. But this is Fremont, where cars are the enemy.
Patty Lacy
Fremont
High court must hear
Trump case quickly
I am furious at the U.S. Supreme Court. I do not disagree that the issue of presidential immunity should be decided by the Supreme Court, but they should have taken the issue up in December when Jack Smith made his request.
The parties are prepared. Scheduling arguments for April 22, seven weeks out, is partisan politics by the court. The people of this country deserve to have Donald Trump’s trials related to the Jan. 6 insurrection and his mishandling of documents conducted and decided before the November election.
If the Supreme Court wants to regain the respect of this country they need to act on this issue now. The court should move up the arguments to March and commit to announcing their decision by the end of April. Justice delayed is justice denied.
Darcy Johnson
Antioch
Krugman column
obscures the facts
Re: “When beliefs drive what we are able to see” (Page A6, Feb. 22).
The last sentence in Paul Krugman’s Feb. 22 column says it all: “How are we going to function as a country when large numbers of people just see a different reality from the rest of us?”
Related Articles
Letters: Proposed development | PUC oversight | Show compassion | Accurate coverage
Letters: Measure B | Favored by unions | A new course | No call | Denying audience | Church’s attributes | Wasting resources
Letters: Lieber for supervisor | Reelect Lofgren | Strongest candidate | Fiscal responsibility | Vote Sreekrishnan | Return expertise | Prop. 1 | Liccardo for Congress | Best prepared
Letters: Lee for Senate | Science background | Divisive rhetoric
Letters: Fiscally responsible | Public financing | Progressive choice | Prioritize climate
Rather than understanding differing viewpoints, he and his cohorts continue to view people with alternative opinions as “deplorables.”
Facts? Don’t confuse him with those. Crime? “Relatively few consider it a serious problem.” What a great example of altering the facts to support his opinion.
Inflation only slightly higher? The rate of inflation has dropped from its 40-year high, but have you checked prices lately?
Tell the whole story, Paul. Give the American people the real facts; we’re smart enough to form our own opinions about reality.
John Griggs
Danville