Plans to establish a football regulator in England could “ruin” the Premier League and destroy one of the country’s biggest exports, one club owner has warned.
The UK government announced in April 2022 that it intends to appoint an independent body following a fan-led review into football. The review was prompted by a number of “high-profile crises” in the sport, said the BBC, including the failed European Super League, the collapse of Bury FC and Macclesfield Town, and the Saudi-backed takeover of Newcastle United.
Under the Football Governance Bill brought to Parliament this week, power handed to the football regulator will centre around three main objectives: improving financial sustainability of clubs, ensuring financial resilience across the leagues and safeguarding English football’s heritage. It will have power to sanction English clubs who break financial and other rules and even force bad owners to sell up.
‘Historic moment for football fans’
Rishi Sunak said the regulator, which is separate from both government and existing football authorities, will help to prevent “financial mismanagement” by “unscrupulous owners”. He called it a “historic moment for football fans”.
First pitched nearly five years ago, it has been “heralded as the possible solution to fixing the game’s broken financial model”, said ITV News. It will primarily be concerned with safeguarding the financial sustainability of clubs in England through a licensing system – covering clubs from the National League up to the Premier League – and to find an agreement between top clubs and the rest of the English Football League (EFL) over how Premier League money is distributed throughout the game.
It comes after Premier League clubs this month walked away from a £900 million support plan for the EFL, a decision that “provoked anger and frustration”, said The Guardian, both “inside the game and across Westminster”.
The Bury South MP, Christian Wakeford, said the “long-awaited move” was a “significant step forward in addressing the systemic issues plaguing our beloved sport”. It would ensure football’s “sustainability for generations to come”, he wrote in the Bury Times.
But while the move has been welcomed by the EFL and Football Association (FA), the Premier League, which represents England’s top 20 clubs, has been more reticent, saying it “recognises and accepts the case for reform” but a regulator “is not necessary”.
‘We may cease to be the top league’
West Ham United’s owner David Sullivan warned the Premier League may not remain the world’s top division if an independent regulator is introduced.
“It is a big export,” Sullivan told BBC Sport. “Anything to water down our income will make us less competitive. We may cease to be the top league so they may ruin an asset that we have.”
The Premier League is “one of Britain’s most famous exports”, agreed Philip Patrick in The Spectator, and “its success is because these clubs have been left relatively free to conduct business”.
If the attempt to “tame this Premier League beast” succeeds it will “create an opportunity for a Premier League 2.0 (most likely in the Middle East) to flourish free of the impositions of pesky regulators spoiling the fun”.
The debate over regulation “highlights the inherently political nature of the sport”, wrote Grimsby Town chair Jason Stockwood in The Guardian. Questioning the “balance between commercialism and community” challenges the very “essence of the game’s existence and for whom it is truly meant”.