PUC approval of PG&E interim request sends bills higher — once again

OAKLAND — PG&E has won approval for an interim rate plan that will shove monthly utility bills higher — yet again — starting in April, a decision that a consumer group calls a “rubber stamp” of the company’s latest request.

Monthly bills for PG&E customers are slated to rise by $4.68 a month for customers who receive combined electricity and gas services from the utility.

The state Public Utilities Commission has approved PG&E’s plans for higher monthly bills as part of a consent calendar that was packed with 54 items.

“The PUC rubber-stamped PG&E’s interim rate request,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, or TURN, a consumer advocacy group.

The regulatory panel approved the consent calendar in a single vote Thursday that featured very little debate by the five members of the powerful — and unelected — commission.

As of early January 2024, PG&E’s average bills for combined services used by the typical residential customer were around $294.50 a month.

This year’s January bills were roughly $53.77 higher than the bills in January 2023, when combined monthly charges for residential customers receiving combined services were averaging $240.73.

Monthly electric bills for a typical residential customer monthly bill are slated to increase by an average of $3.65. The gas bill for a typical residential customer is expected to rise by $1.03 a month, PG&E estimated.

The estimated increase of $4.68 would take the average monthly bill to the edge of a brutal benchmark.

Starting in April, the average monthly PG&E bill for combined services is slated to be around $299.18 a month — just shy of the ominous milestone of $300 a month.

  Ex-Citi VP in Chicago Helen Caldwell ripped by judge for swindling elderly clients, gets 30 months in prison

“The Wildfire Gas and Safety Cost Interim Rate Relief decision authorizes a temporary rate change to start recouping a portion of the money that was spent for wildfire mitigation and delivering key safety, compliance and modernization investments for our energy system,” PG&E spokesperson Mike Gazda said in comments emailed to this news organization.

It’s possible that the interim higher bills could lead to a refund if further regulatory review determines customers were forced to overpay on the interim basis.

“These costs were not included in prior rate proceedings,” Gazda stated in the email comments. “We have requested to recover these costs over multiple years to limit the impact on customers.”

Related Articles

Economy |


Storm knocks out power to 35,000 PG&E customers in Bay Area

Economy |


Letters: Proposed development | PUC oversight | Show compassion | Accurate coverage

Economy |


PG&E profits hop higher as electric and gas revenue jumps

Economy |


State lawmakers seek to short-circuit new income-based utility charges

Economy |


Bay Area resident helps neighbors see the light during power outages

The monthly charges that went into effect in January 2024 were 22.3% higher than the average bill for the typical residential customer during the same month the year before.

That means PG&E monthly bills have soared higher at a pace that outstrips the annual inflation rate, as measured by consumer prices, in the Bay Area. During 2023, consumer prices rose 2.6% in the Bay Area.

Put another way, monthly charges for PG&E residential customers are rising more than eight times faster than the Bay Area inflation rate.

The state regulators claim they hope to bring PG&E bill increases more in line with the annual inflation rate. At present, that goal appears to be beyond easy reach.

  Browns QB Deshaun Watson Gives Opinion on Play-Calling Duties

Gov. Gavin Newsom appointed all five of the current commissioners of the PUC. The five commissioners were all confirmed by the state Senate.

Toney was disappointed the state PUC approved the interim increase in rates, leading to yet another jump in monthly costs, through a mass endorsement by the commissioners of the consent agenda.

“Ratepayers deserve an explanation from the five commissioners about why they approved this,” Toney said.

 

 

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *