Editorial: Void any Biden leadership on the refugee crisis, Denver stands up a real plan

Denver’s new plan to care for migrants and refugees has real merit and is worth the risks. The Denver Asylum Seeker Program launched on Wednesday is perhaps the most creative and ambitious plan developed by Mayor Mike Johnston, to date, and that’s saying something.

We are proud that our city — once defiantly proclaiming “Immigrants Welcome” during the Trump administration — has stepped up to care for the approximately 40,000 people who were bussed here from the southern border.

But that care has cost $68 million since December of 2022.

Johnston’s plan will provide more services to fewer refugees, allowing the city to reduce costs and avoid public-facing budget cuts.

The Asylum Seeker Program will give the roughly 800 refugees and migrants currently in Denver hotel shelters and 200 other individuals intensive legal assistance for up to six months. That legal assistance could help people proactively apply for asylum and receive temporary work permits while their cases are adjudicated in the backlogged immigration court system. During that time, the city will house and feed the immigrants.

Moving away from the city’s current policy of offering two week stays (42 days for families) in hotels is necessary because the newest arrivals have the hardest path to employment and self-sufficiency. Our market for jobs that pay cash outside federal employment laws is saturated. Those arriving today also don’t qualify for Temporary Protected Status and are unable to book appointments through Customs and Border Protection’s mobile application to claim asylum.

We buy into the idea that it’d be better to support fewer families while helping them file their complex legal cases and get work permits than to house thousands for 14 days and kick them out without a viable path to employment. Also, the entire Denver metro area will benefit from employees jumping into a strong labor market full of vacancies.

  Gavin Sheets blocks out outside noise, chooses his battles

So what do we do for those who arrive after April 10 and aren’t part of Denver’s new “Asylum Seekers Program?”

It’s a valid question and the weak point of Johnston’s plan.

Denver will begin to act as a clearinghouse for refugees, providing 48 hours of emergency congregate shelter and care, but then pushing people out.

Denver’s dedicated employees will be working hand in hand with other cities across the nation so their mayors can replicate our Asylum Seeker Program. By and large, those arriving in America from other countries are ready and eager to work. By showing cities how they can help this wayward group get work permits, Denver can help with their employee shortages and save Denver taxpayers money.

Some refugees and migrants might go to family and friends who can support them and pay for their asylum cases to be filed, or to employment that occurs illegally outside of our federal tax system in other cities and states. If there is another big surge, we expect the city will have to use contingency funds and emergency reserves to provide emergency shelter and if other cities refuse those without American contacts, Denver will have to scramble.

We cannot prevent refugees from coming to America.

Even if President Donald Trump had built his promised wall in 2016 and approved funding to militarize the border with armed guards preventing crossings by Venezuelan refugees and migrants from other countries in South and Central America, the result would have been a humanitarian catastrophe in Mexico. A refugee camp of at least a million people would have formed on Mexico’s northern border, a clear violation of international laws and humanitarian ideals. While Mexico is a relatively affluent country compared to other countries in Central and South America, it is the poorest country in North America by a long shot and is ill-equipped to care for refugees.

  CHP investigating claim of Oakland freeway shooting on I-980

Already between 6 million and 7 million people have fled Venezuela. Many have ended up in other South and Central American countries and thousands have crossed the border in Mexico seeking asylum in the United States.

Biden should be welcoming refugees at the border with an orderly intake process and dispersal throughout the country to fully funded resettlement programs equipped to handle applications for work permits and asylum cases. This process also would allow the U.S. to screen for dangerous criminals and terrorists who need to be deported immediately.

Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott meanwhile has greeted the vacuum of federal control and care for refugees with indifference and his own political aspirations. Abbott has bused thousands of refugees to the places Trump labeled “sanctuary cities” like Denver, New York and Chicago. We cannot blame him for moving migrants along, but we wish he’d taken less of a malicious approach.

Related Articles

Editorials |


Denver strategy shift on migrant crisis comes with lower budget impact, restored rec center hours

Editorials |


Opinion: Climate change will force the world to play a grim game — adapt, move, or die

Editorials |


Should Colorado meet migrants with compassion or turn them away? Voters are split on question, poll says

Editorials |


Many Americans say immigrants contribute to economy but there’s worry over risks, AP-NORC poll finds

Editorials |


US changes how it categorizes people by race and ethnicity. It’s the first revision in 27 years

Johnston assures us that Denver will not be using charter buses for mass removal from Colorado, but will instead be purchasing tickets on an individual basis for destinations where food and shelter (and hopefully legal aid set up using the Denver model) exist.

  De La Salle rugby dynasty setting standard for the sport in California

We can hold our heads high that we continue to care for refugees. But now it’s time for Johnston to do what Biden should have done long ago and launch a nationwide resettlement program with a blueprint for obtaining job permits.

We know there are places in America with ethical leaders who will step up and meet Johnston’s call, using their own city’s resources (coupled with some state and federal dollars) to get these refugees on their feet while they wait years for their asylum cases to be processed.

Between the inept response from Biden and the unethical response from Abbott, we’ll fully endorse Johnston’s approach. We implore other cities to support refugees while providing the expensive legal aid needed to get work permits.

Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *