Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall declared ‘unsuitable,’ must shut down in 60 days due to low staffing

A state regulator has once again ordered Los Angeles County to shut down its largest juvenile hall, Los Padrinos, within 60 days over the unsafe conditions caused by short staffing.

The Board of State and Community Corrections issued a “notice of facility unsuitability” to the county Probation Department on Monday, Oct. 14. The notice, addressed to probation Chief Guillermo Viera Rosa, states the county failed to develop a sufficient plan to address long-standing staffing shortages and, as a result, the Downey facility must be emptied by Dec. 12.

The BSCC rejected the plan submitted by the county last week because it “did not adequately outline how the Department plans to correct the issue of noncompliance, nor did it provide reasonable timeframes for resolution of the staffing deficiencies.”

The agency has not demonstrated “there are an adequate number of personnel sufficient to carry out the overall facility operation and its programming, to provide for safety and security of youth and staff, and meet established standards and regulations,” according to the notice.

Under state law, a facility is required to have an “approved” corrective action plan on file within two months of failing an inspection, or it is automatically declared “unsuitable” for the confinement of youth.

There is a chance the county could stop the process, as it has done in the past, if it can prove it has addressed the staffing shortages by passing another inspection before the December deadline. However, whether that inspection will happen quickly enough is up in the air. The last time Los Angeles County appeared before BSCC in April, for the exact same reason, board members warned they would not be lenient if Los Padrinos failed again and suggested they would push for closure in the event of a repeat offense.

  Angelenos watch Rams’ opener in most unusual setting

Though it would be unprecedented, the board could choose not to reinspect and instead let the clock run out.

“It is clear they cannot trust L.A. County anymore,” said Aditi Sherikar, a senior policy associate with the Children’s Defense Fund California.

Sherikar and other advocates have urged Los Angeles County to focus on reducing its juvenile population through decarceration, rather than solely attempting to increase its staffing numbers. Efforts to recruit new probation officers and to incentive employees to show up for work have been largely ineffective, and that’s not likely to change in two months, she said.

Last year, the Board of Supervisors pledged to put the “full force” of the county behind Los Padrinos. Now, that same energy is needed to reduce the number of youth in custody, Sherikar said.

“Their options are limited,” she said. “They could refuse to decarcerate, in which case they would have to shut down the hall because we know their staffing measures don’t work.”

If L.A. County cannot address either staffing or the population at Los Padrinos in time, the youth in custody at Los Padrinos would need to be transferred to other facilities, likely in neighboring counties, creating a hindrance for their families and friends. The county does not have any backup locations large enough to house the roughly 300 youth at Los Padrinos.

The BSCC has only ever closed two juvenile facilities through the suitability process, both in Los Angeles County. In 2023, the board previously found Central Juvenile Hall and Barry J. Nidorf Juvenile Hall “unsuitable” and the county chose to reopen Los Padrinos, which had closed in 2019 after a long history of oversight and safety problems, to consolidate its staff and all predisposition youth — juveniles who have not had their day in court — at a single location.

  Alexander: Tyler Glasnow has established himself as Dodgers’ ace

The same problems that resulted in the closures of the other two facilities almost immediately reappeared at Los Padrinos.

The BSCC similarly ordered Los Padrinos to close in February 2024 because the facility did not have enough staff showing up for work to provide the safety and services required by state law, but L.A. County, through the mandatory reassignment of hundreds of field officers, managed to bring the numbers up enough to stop the process before an April deadline. Los Padrinos seemed to stabilize during that first reassignment, however, once the reassigned officers finished their 60-day rotation, the problems began again.

The turnaround was short-lived. By June, half of the 541 employees at Los Padrinos were on leave and dozens were still calling out every day, according to figures provided to the Los Angeles County Probation Oversight Commission. The constant call-outs have been attributed to safety concerns and are compounded by worries that the employees will be held over for additional shifts when others don’t show up.

Related links

Nearly 20% of shifts at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall did not meet staffing minimums in July
LA County’s troubled juvenile halls allowed to remain open
Probation officers accuse LA County of unfair labor practices over forced redeployments
4 more LA County probation officers placed on leave over juvenile hall violence
Is LA County putting itself at legal risk by sending light-duty probation officers home?

In July, nearly 20% of shifts at Los Padrinos failed to meet staffing minimums. That understaffing led to youth arriving late to school, missing out on recreational activities and being stuck in their rooms for unallowable amounts of time. Teachers working for a community-based organization notified the county in a letter in early October that they would not return to Los Padrinos because they feared for their safety.

  Trump, on social media, describes being ‘shot with a bullet’ in the ear

“On our first class day, our teachers witnessed a probation officer get violently attacked by a young person who was not part of our class, and, disturbingly, they observed that other probation officers present not only did not intervene, but verbally chided the officer being attacked rather than assisting,” the letter states.

“We would like to emphasize that we do not feel this is a safe environment for any CBO, or the youth at Los Padrinos. Long periods of time without any staff present, locked in, with no contact to any outside staff or help, would be extremely dangerous in any environment, let alone one where violent incidents have been reported nearly every week.”

The BSCC meets next on Nov. 21, when it is likely to decide whether to reinspect Los Padrinos.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *