California ranks No. 9 for economic ‘balance’

2 months ago

Which state economies are best at juggling the needs of bosses and workers alike?

In recent months, my trusty spreadsheet produced a pair of state economic rankings. One took the view from the employer’s perspective. The other saw economics through the employee’s eye.

Let’s politely say there were passionate responses to both scorecards, with California getting poor marks for business friendliness but high grades for worker benefits.

As an attempt to settle numerous debates, those rankings were combined to create a scorecard measuring what I’ll call the most “balanced” state economies.

This math shows California ranking No. 9 for reasonable management of the battle between boss and employee.

The best spot for this yardstick of economic symmetry was Virginia, followed by Washington state, Colorado, Florida, and Massachusetts, New Hampshire. Texas was No. 10.

Worst states? Louisiana, Mississippi, West Virginia, Kentucky and Arkansas.

How did we get here?

Let’s refresh our memories of those previous grades.

When it comes to business-leaning scores – compiled with stats tracking everything from taxes to regulation to growth – California ranked No. 30

Tops were North Carolina, Utah, Texas, Tennessee and Florida. The lowest were Hawaii, Louisiana, Alaska, New Mexico and Rhode Island.

As for employee-centric thinking, my rankings looked at variables such as wages, labor laws and layoffs. It scored California third-best.

The Golden State was topped by Massachusetts and Washington and was followed by New York and Connecticut. Meanwhile, the least worker-friendly states were Mississippi, Georgia, Louisiana, West Virginia and Idaho.

Trump administration’s data deletions set off ‘a mad scramble,’ researcher says

And this scorecard graded California’s major rivals Texas (No. 34) and Florida (No. 20).

Bottom line

This isn’t just comparing two samplings of business-related stats. The boss vs. worker scrum is a tussle that governments and corporations often struggle to manage.

How much leeway should bosses have in managing their staffs? What’s the proper level of business fees and taxes? Or how much should government nudge up wages?

Contemplate these results with a wider lens – states sliced into three groups according to their “balance” grades.

The highest-scoring states had the most workers, the fastest job creation since 2019, and the highest wages. Perhaps the middle ground in this debate is most appealing to the masses.

My balance ranking’s top third had 77 million workers as of September – roughly half the nation’s staffing. Typical earnings ran at a $60,400 annual pace. Those states added 5 million jobs in five years, or 7% growth.

Yet, the modest pay of low-score states may appeal to some bosses.

States at the bottom of the balance gradings had 23 million workers typically earning $55,000 yearly. These states added 1 million jobs in five years, or 4.6% growth.

Yes, that’s slower hiring. Yet it’s also job creation that outpaces the balance ranking’s center slice. Those states had 57 million workers making $57,000 yearly – with 1.1 million new jobs, but that’s only 2% growth.

Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

My most-read columns of 2024 …

No. 1: It takes $349,200 income to buy an Orange County home, 3.5 times the US salary
No. 2: 20 least-affordable US cities to buy a home are all in California
No. 3: Resort at Pelican Hill switching to Marriott management, St. Regis brand
No. 4: California has 13 of the most unaffordable small US cities
No. 5: Temecula ranked as one of ’50 best places to live in US’
No. 6: 3 Southern California communities among fastest-selling home projects in US
No. 7: Finally, Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World opens in Irvine
No. 8: California auto insurance premiums soaring 54% this year
No. 9: Laguna Niguel’s ‘Ziggurat’ building in $150 million-plus bidding war
No. 10: Where is California’s hardest spot to find an apartment?