Usa new news

Is the US a rogue superpower now?

The Iran war follows on the heels of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on allies and threats to take Greenland from NATO partner Denmark. Now, the president is demanding other countries reopen the Strait of Hormuz closed by the war he launched. Critics say Trump has transformed the United States from the so-called leader of the free world into a rogue superpower that threatens global stability.

Trump has driven “deep and perhaps permanent wedges” between the U.S. and its allies in Europe and Asia, Robert Kagan said at The Atlantic. The Iran war was launched with “no public debate, no vote in Congress” and no consultation “with allies other than Israel.” Europeans must now wonder if the war signals that the president is “more or less likely” to “take similarly bold action on Greenland.” American global leadership survived unpopular wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan. It may not survive this.

Weaker, lonelier and less effective

The fallout from Iran demonstrates the administration “either didn’t understand how its actions would affect other states or simply didn’t care,” Stephen M. Walt said at Foreign Policy. That leaves “every country in the world” trying to determine how to work with “an increasingly rogue United States.” For now, America’s ostensible friends have to weigh whether U.S. power “could be used to harm them either intentionally or inadvertently.”

Every post-Cold War administration has taken on actual “rogue” states, Matthew Kroenig said at The Wall Street Journal. U.S. presidents have waged a “de facto campaign of toppling anti-American dictators” such as Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. Iran is the “biggest prize” on the list. Even if the Islamic regime does not fall under the weight of U.S. attacks, it will be “too weak to pose a serious threat for years to come.” That puts Trump “on the verge of eliminating the world’s rogue states.”

A swaggering superpower “could be a collective asset for the democratic world,” Hal Brands said at Bloomberg. But Trump’s approach could transform the United States into an “out-of-control hegemon” at risk of being “weaker, lonelier and less effective than before.” Success in Iran might “create a new Middle East with a U.S.-led coalition at its core” but failure will serve as a “damaging rebuff of U.S. power.”

Allies look to Beijing

The United States “had to do it ourselves” because other countries would not join the “decapitation of Iran,” Trump said in a Wednesday night prime-time speech to the nation. The president has threatened to leave NATO over the issue, but there are “few signs that’s happening,” said Politico.


Polling shows residents of Canada, Germany, France and the United Kingdom now “believe it is better to depend on China” than the U.S., Politico said. The United States “no longer works in partnership” with its old allies, former Deputy Assistant Secretary Mark Lambert told the outlet, “and is only focused on itself.”

Exit mobile version