By PHILIP MARCELO
NEW YORK (AP) — The judge in Daniel Penny’s subway chokehold manslaughter trial urged jurors on Friday to continue their deliberations after they told him they couldn’t reach a unanimous vote on the top charge.
The Manhattan jurors have been deliberating since Tuesday on whether to convict Penny in the death of Jordan Neely, who the Marine veteran held in a chokehold for about six minutes on a New York City subway on May 1, 2023.
The panelists sent Judge Maxwell Wiley a note in the morning stating they were unable to agree on a verdict on the manslaughter charge.
Wiley then read them what’s known as an Allen charge — an instruction urging them to make every possible effort to reach a verdict.
As he pressed the jurors to continue, Wiley commended them for being “very conscientious in your deliberations,” noting that it’s not uncommon to have difficulties in reaching a verdict.
But he warned that if they cannot, a new trial will have to be scheduled with a different jury and there’s no reason to think any other jury would be more fair or hard-working than them.
He said two and a half days of deliberations may seem like a long time, but “given the factual complexity of the case, I don’t think it’s too long.”
The jury, shortly before taking a lunch break, requested clarification on how they determine whether a person reasonably believes physical force to be necessary.
“We’d like to better understand the term ‘reasonable person,’” their note read in part.
Wiley told the jury it was for them to decide what a reasonable person would do in the situation — whether a person would have reasonably believed Neely was about to use physical force against Penny or someone else.
Penny’s lawyers have said he was protecting himself and other subway passengers from a volatile, mentally ill man who was making alarming remarks and gestures. Prosecutors said Penny reacted far too forcefully to someone he perceived as a peril, not a person.
Penny is facing a second count of criminally negligent homicide, but the jurors were instructed that they must reach a verdict on the manslaughter charge before they can move on to that.
Manslaughter requires proving a defendant recklessly caused another person’s death, and carries up to 15 years. Criminally negligent homicide, which carries punishments ranging from probation to up to four years in prison, involves engaging in serious “blameworthy conduct” while not perceiving such a risk.
While the jurors were out of the courtroom, Wiley acknowledged that he may have to consider whether they can simply move on to the criminal negligence if they remained deadlocked on the manslaughter charge.
Related Articles
ICE is looking for a new detention center in Northern California. The state probably can’t stop it
Lionel Messi wins MLS MVP award, the latest trophy on a long list of honors for the Inter Miami star
Trump inauguration 2025: How Californians can get tickets to attend the January event
Video of Border Patrol SUV striking man near California-Mexico fence prompts investigation
Bay Area native Jared Goff, Lions beat Packers on last-second field goal to clinch playoff spot
Prosecutors suggested they could be open to this, meaning the manslaughter charge would be essentially dismissed.
During the monthlong trial, the anonymous jury heard from witnesses, police, pathologists, a Marine Corps instructor who trained Penny in chokehold techniques, as well as Penny’s relatives, friends and fellow Marines. Penny chose not to testify.
The jury has made several requests to the judge since entering deliberations Tuesday.
They asked to review the police and bystander video at the center of the trial. They requested a readout of a city medical examiner’s testimony. They also asked the judge to re-read the criminal definitions of recklessness and negligence in open court and be provided with written copies of the statutes.
Neely, 30, was a sometime subway performer with a tragic life story: His mother was killed and stuffed in a suitcase when he was a teenager. His adult life spiraled into homelessness, psychiatric hospitalizations, drug abuse and criminal convictions, including for assaulting people at subway stations.
Penny, 26, went on to study architecture. He is white. Neely was Black.
The case became a flashpoint in the nation’s debate over racial injustice and crime, as well as the city’s ongoing struggle to deal with homelessness and mental health crises in a transit system used by millions of New Yorkers every day.
There were sometimes dueling demonstrations outside the courthouse, and high-profile Republican politicians portrayed Penny as a hero while prominent Democrats went to Neely’s funeral.