Letters: Omar Torres | Homeownership gap | Nuclear power | Electoral reform

Submit your letter to the editor via this form. Read more Letters to the Editor.

Council, mayor jumpingthe legal gun on Torres

Re: “Mayor, peers call for Torres’ resignation” (Page A1, Oct. 17).

After it was announced that Councilmember Omar Torres was under investigation involving sexual misconduct with a minor, the mayor and the City Council asked Torres to resign.

The mayor was quoted as saying our councilmembers have to be held to a higher standard. What are the metrics being used by the City Council? What are the standards for the rest of the council if they can play judge and jury before a trial has even started?

Let’s all abide by a higher standard and let the legal system decide.

Refugio MorenoSan Jose

Tax reform could helphomeownership gap

Re: “California homeownership gap grows, divides along race lines” (Page A12, Oct. 27).

I read Dan Walters’ op-ed about the difficulty of purchasing a home in California.

The solution to the problem is to increase the supply. It’s not surprising that most people who purchased their homes “a half-century ago” have accrued vast wealth. If they sell, they are penalized because of the capital gains taxes they will owe. For married couples filing a joint return, only $500,000 is excluded from taxes. This tax is not indexed for inflation. It’s also not indexed for geography.

The other problem is property taxes. Purchasing a home at an elevated price results in property taxes that are exorbitant. This also eliminates many from being able to afford a home.

  CIF executives talk transfer portal, NIL, championship locations, future of flag football

Eliminating capital gains taxes would encourage more individuals to sell, increasing the supply. Reducing property taxes would also help by reducing the total amount of the payments.

Thomas BakerSan Jose

Nuclear power’s returnraises safety issues

Re: “Is nuclear power making a comeback? And could it even happen in California?” (Oct. 16).

In Rob Nikolewski’s article, he talks about the rise of nuclear power as a clean energy option. While this sounds good, it misses some important issues like safety and waste.

Reopening the Three Mile Island plant might seem like a good idea, but it brings back fears about nuclear accidents. Past disasters at places like Three Mile Island and Chernobyl still worry many people. We still don’t have a safe way to deal with nuclear waste.

California should continue to focus on renewable energy sources like solar and wind. These options are safer and can help create jobs and new technology without the dangers of nuclear power.

As we consider our energy future, we need to carefully consider the risks of bringing back nuclear power. We should also put more effort into building renewable energy. This way, we can have a safer and more sustainable future for everyone in California.

Martin PhamSan Jose

In election’s wake, let’ssee electoral reform

Equity demands electoral reform. The electoral college was created when only White male property owners could vote. We have a more inclusive election system today.

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Extra $180M | Piedmont safety | Lee’s legacy | Crumbl is behind | Uprooting homeless

  Liam Payne Shared Bonding Moment in Last Instagram Post Featuring Son Bear

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: County land | Work harder | HCA’s misdeeds | Dewan’s ouster | Mental health

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: Livermore council | Recall Price | San Ramon schools | New Haven schools | Lafayette council | Pleasanton council | Fremont mayor | Family farms

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: San Jose council | Vote for Liccardo | Low for Congress | Saratoga schools | Measure Q | Board of education | Campbell Union board | Santa Clara council

Letters to the Editor |


Letters: State Senate | Pinole City Council | Pleasanton council | East Bay parks | Contra Costa elections

The 40 least-populous states, including the District of Columbia, have 270 electoral votes, the number needed to elect a president. The 11 largest states have 268 electoral votes. Is that equitable?

The disparity is more shocking when you calculate the number of residents per state per electoral college vote. Wyoming, the smallest state by population, has one electoral vote per 192,284 residents. In California, each of our 54 electoral votes represents 732,189 citizens. Is a California vote less valuable than a Wyoming vote?

American democracy is historically based on the one-person, one-vote ideal. Electoral reform is needed today to re-establish equity among voters. Electing a president by the popular vote is one way to achieve that.

Dennis HawkinsSan Jose

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *