In praise of gridlock


Like Caesar at Alesia, congressional Democrats have encircled the Trump administration and yet are themselves beset by a Republican Senate. But they are unlikely to share Caesar’s triumph; our collective fate here is gridlock.

Winning the House was not the shining blue victory for which many hoped. It simply marks the start of a two-year siege.

This will not be a popular result. Americans are, almost always, deeply unhappy with Congress, and gridlock is the top reason for our dissatisfaction. We want our lawmakers to do stuff. If we produced so little completed work product at our jobs, we gripe, we’d be fired in a flash. Gridlock is commonly held as an urgent problem to be solved, an emblem of the deep dysfunction that permeates our politics.

But gridlock is not the worst-case scenario! Whatever your worst fears for the midterms were, gridlock is better. In fact, given the alternatives, it’s arguably not so bad at all.

Crucially, gridlock entails a slower rate of change. Yes, this means the changes we would like to see will not happen any time soon. In the next two years, President Trump may be flattered into signing a few Democratic bills if they can somehow make it through the Senate — “Chuck and Nancy” dabbled in this effort to overcome the president’s partisanship with adulation last year, and they briefly seemed close to clinching the deal. But realistically, Democrats won’t have many such wins. Whatever House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) promises about restoring “the Constitution’s checks and balances to the Trump administration,” serious legislative pushback is all but a nonstarter with a divided Congress. The sort of major structural reform we need to rein in overgrown executive power will not happen, even if Democrats were so inclined.

Likewise, any planned GOP juggernaut will have to be put on hold. It seems doubtful that would have happened regardless, for as The Week’s Matthew Walther has noted, the GOP seems “satisfied with legislative paralysis in Washington and happy to see Trump make and implement policy via executive order.” The tax cuts aside, Republicans have done remarkably little on the legislative front with control of the government, and gridlock will see that continue. The proper expectation for both sides is stasis.

But here’s the really good news: That slower rate of change also means many of the changes you do not want to see will also be stalled.

Things will not get more miserable at a fast pace — and at this point, I’m honestly pretty happy with that. This would all be more reassuring were we not dealing with an imperial presidency that has become as much a source of policy as the Congress, but a concrete limit on the ways in which our government can get more terrible is welcome nonetheless.

In theory, at least, the laws which do pass under gridlock are subject to greater scrutiny. This is by design, as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay …read more

Source:: The Week – Politics

      

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *